Thread: Proposal: Oilers/Flyers/Coyotes
View Single Post
Old
12-14-2012, 11:37 AM
  #83
Rutkowski
Registered User
 
Rutkowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 542
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
Too bad you can`t logically remove that 8 point game. It makes as much sense as someone saying that Gagner will be a 150 point player if he can take those two weeks and do it for an entire year. Makes no sense at all, you can`t pick and choose your games.
Except statistical abnormalities getting removed is very relevant when it comes to a player's actual skill getting evaluated. If he had a couple of those games per season, or hell, during his career then yes they'd be relevant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
Pheonix has no legitimate number one scoring center.
And yet he is Phoenix' first line center. No, he doesn't provide the points but he did let Vrbata and Whitney to it instead. Getting rid of him for a non-center only makes the problem worse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sceva Sct View Post
I agree that Hanzal being a third center on some others teams isn't so ridiculous, and most other teams he wouldn't be more than a second right now, and thats really why any proposal involving him on these boards tend to go downhill real quick. Other teams/fans want to give up second/third line value for OUR top line center, so it simply will never work. Given our system, how effective Hanzal is in shutting down the top centers in our division, our lack of a true top line center and lack of any real depth at the position to speak of, trading Hanzal is tantamount to suicide if we aren't getting back what other teams would, rightfully from their standpoint of how their going to use Hanzal, consider massive overpayment based on how we have to use him.
Pretty much this, yeah.

Rutkowski is offline   Reply With Quote