View Single Post
12-16-2012, 01:44 PM
Registered Luser.
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Van!
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,000
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Henri M View Post
Maybe there is something wrong with you reading comprehension Just kidding.

I was mainly addressing those who call it a "meaningless" tournament, and I already explained why I feel it has value. What I would like is to get a respons as to why anyone can make an attempt on an objective statement, claiming that WHC is not a tournament that matters. Which was what I responded to.

Note that I did not respond to someone saying it does not matter to him or her, but to proclaime a certain truth that is does not matter overall, should be backed up with some sort of coherent argument. Seeing as this would then tie up to the topic discussion which is in regards to the level of relevance of the IIHF ranking system.
Do you think that commentary on the meaningfulness of the WHC has anything to do with Canada not being #1?

craigcaulks* is offline