Thread: Value of: Mikhail Grabovski
View Single Post
Old
12-16-2012, 07:56 PM
  #35
DJOpus
Registered User
 
DJOpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,841
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hlaverty06 View Post
This is about plekanec, and one... It's an expensive "replacement" and your giving up futures.
I'd take either as a Canucks fan and rate then similarly.

I feel there is more than one way to address secondary scoring.

Sedin - Sedin - Burrows
Higgins - Kesler - Hansen/Kassian
Booth - Plekanec - Raymond/Hansen

Looks solid to me and any one player could go down and we would still be okay.

I have no problem giving up our 1st, 2nd, and Gaunce since we will likely get similar back for Luongo... Basically its Luongo for Plekanec.

I think Pleks would be better for Van than Grabo because he's more of a setup man for Booth.

DJOpus is offline   Reply With Quote