Lockout Discussion Thread 4.0
View Single Post
12-17-2012, 12:40 AM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Originally Posted by
You can get the cap numbers from cap geek. You can subtract the cap from total revenue+operating income from Forbes "business of hockey", and the difference should be equal to non-cap hockey expenses. Maybe I could do it. It would take ... 30 minutes.
I think 7 years and 30 teams is a lot. I assume it's the same teams spending a lot year after year.
You're right that cap spending and non-cap spending will be correlated. Should not be an issue with enough teams.
The teams are interrelated. Creating a system in which you look at data that hasn't had time to normalize is flawed. You can do it but what would it prove when you don't start at a true equal footing?
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LyricalLyricist