2012-13 Lockout Discussion Part VIIII: "We're Close" "We're Not Close" Edition
View Single Post
12-17-2012, 04:13 PM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York
Originally Posted by
Bleed Ranger Blue
How would the players feel about that?
Especially the ones who would have lost paychecks and would be completely losing their NHL roster spots? All over seemingly trivial things like 5+ year contracts and other issues they'd never be in consideration for in the first place?
Talk about getting completely ****ed over.
That's exactly why they should stop playing be fearless leader Fehr's rules and holding out for a "better" deal. Who is it better for? If you take the 5 year maximum now and play hockey or you hold out trying to get the NHL to cave on contract limits and two teams fold, losing 46+ players jobs, was the deal you held out for better for those 46+ players? Or was it better for the top 5% of the league who will actually EVER be offered a deal longer than 5 years in the first place? The whole thing is so logic deprived that I can't fathom it anymore.
View Public Profile
SERE 24's albums
Find More Posts by SERE 24