View Single Post
12-17-2012, 04:32 PM
Registered User
EverettMike's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Everett, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 19,965
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by CharaTriedToEatMe View Post
I understand your point.

But are you arguing that a free for all between all 30 teams is in the leagues best interest or that of any team other than the Maple Leafs?

If contracts are null and void to me it seems only logical that there is a gentlemans agreement among owners to only sign players they previously had under contract.
You don't understand my point if you think a gentlemen agreement is okay. That is collusion, it violates the law.

And I think it is terrible for the owners. They shouldn't have suggested It.

EverettMike is offline