2012 CBA/Lockout talk, It's not looking good VI
View Single Post
12-17-2012, 04:32 PM
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Everett, MA
Originally Posted by
I understand your point.
But are you arguing that a free for all between all 30 teams is in the leagues best interest or that of any team other than the Maple Leafs?
If contracts are null and void to me it seems only logical that there is a gentlemans agreement among owners to only sign players they previously had under contract.
You don't understand my point if you think a gentlemen agreement is okay. That is collusion, it violates the law.
And I think it is terrible for the owners. They shouldn't have suggested It.
View Public Profile
Visit EverettMike's homepage!
Find More Posts by EverettMike