View Single Post
Old
12-19-2012, 03:57 PM
  #122
ChuckWoods
Registered User
 
ChuckWoods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,502
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt1396 View Post
wtf that trade has 6 players in it and 7 pieces in it. No way this should go through.

In the rules I stated there would be "exceptions" to exceeding the player limit for "throw ins" to even out contracts.

There are two questions I have to look at;

1) Is Ryan Ellis still considered a prospect? Is his role defined as "NHL" player. But he's not. He is listed as a Minor Top 4. That means he's still a prospect. This is a non issue.



So the only issue with this is;
2) Matt Ellis - Is he technically a "throw in". I am not overly familiar with this player, but if he's not exactly a throw in, this may need to be tweaked again. I will take a look shortly.



But regardless, it sounds as if Matt Ellis has changed to Tarnasky, a "useless filler'. So this deal will be approved.

ChuckWoods is offline   Reply With Quote