Lockout V: Take the Long Way Home
View Single Post
12-20-2012, 05:03 PM
Join Date: Jan 2005
Originally Posted by
Anaheim is currently losing money because they were horrible last year. And the state has been in a massive recession. They were a cap team for several years, don't let that get int the way of your argument though.
It's a logical fallacy that all the teams will become mediocre. The top teams simply won't be AS elite but there's a fair case that the bottom teams are just as bad. Having a larger number of good teams actually leads to a larger number of entertaining games. High end games between 4-5 elite teams who steamroller everyone else (as in, not good hockey) vs slightly less high end games between 14-16 good teams leads to a lot more entertainment league-wide IMO.
Not true. Far too many games now -- including playoff games -- are low-scoring, one-goal games where the winner is decided on a fluke goal -- a bounce off a defenseman's skate or the like.
I haven't bothered to try to find data, but the number of own goals and unintended goals, as a percentage of goals, has to be at least triple what it was 20 years ago. It wouldn't shock me if it's ten times higher.
That's "parity" hockey.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Greschner4