Thread: Prospect Info: 2012 Prospect Thread IV
View Single Post
Old
12-22-2012, 10:11 AM
  #830
forthewild
Registered User
 
forthewild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,617
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarick View Post
Mikko's hockey IQ and skills aren't at Granlund's level.

Look at their stats:

18 years in SM-Liiga
Koivu: 0.15 ppg
Granlund: 1.0 ppg

19 years in SM-Liiga
Koivu: 0.54 ppg
Granlund: 0.92 ppg

20 years in SM-Liiga
Koivu: 067 ppg
Granlund: 1.13 ppg

21 years in AHL
Koivu: 0.72 ppg
Granlund: 1.0 ppg

Granlund is able to adapt quickly to higher levels of play at a young age. That's a sign of TREMENDOUS hockey IQ and of course his very high end offensive skills. Koivu was able to adapt but it took longer as he had to learn to adapt to stronger competition.

Look at Koivu's NHL stats:
22 years: 0.33 ppg
23 years: 0.66 ppg
24 years: 0.74 ppg
25 years: 0.85 ppg
26 years: 0.89 ppg
27 years: 0.87 ppg
28 years: 0.80 ppg

It took Mikko four years to hit his peak numbers in the NHL. I'd expect Granlund to him them by year two or three.

I am not worried whatsoever about Granlund. He was at or near the top offensively in the AHL until he got injured.
Mikko hasn't hit his peak yet, some of those teams he was on were ******* bad, we have relied on him on the PK as well so that ate up some of his energy every game.

Also while Granlund might have better skill then Koivu, i think Koivu has a way better NHL game then Granlund, his size along with his strength allows him to be a better player. in short i think Granlund will have less impact then Koivu.


Last edited by forthewild: 12-22-2012 at 10:18 AM.
forthewild is offline