View Single Post
12-23-2012, 12:52 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,501
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Mork
Originally Posted by ckrnke View Post
I just don't get the reasoning behind this kind of thinking. People are sayin if they just played under old CBA, a deal would have been reached along with no games missed... The thing is, no deal would have ever happend! The PA would keep stalling because they would have no reason to negotiate while they are making 57 percent of the $. We would be in the same situation next year. Honesty, a lockout was the only path available once the PA showed that it was unwilling to negotiate back in January.
You make a valid point.

However, unlike the other poster, you're not suggesting that the lockout is not really a lockout, but a strike.

The owners had a choice, and they chose a lockout. That's all.

Mork is offline