View Single Post
Old
12-24-2012, 05:26 PM
  #69
arsmaster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,729
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kcanucks View Post
Late and unnecessary, ergo he got a penalty. If Petterson wasn't a soft player he wouldn't have gotten hurt and there's probably no suspension. If Petterson still had the puck he still gets demolished, should there be a suspension then?

Three games is excessive.
This is my stance as well.

Hits that late on defensman moving the puck from that spot on the ice happen ALL the time.

In this instance the outcome was devastating. If the player popped back up he wouldn't have eve got 2 minutes.

arsmaster is offline   Reply With Quote