Thread: Ballpark Effect
View Single Post
Old
12-27-2012, 01:03 AM
  #15
Machinehead
Moderator
Siez and toffnuss!
 
Machinehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New York New York
Country: United States
Posts: 39,121
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by piqued View Post
Yeah you can't just look at pure distance.

In Arlington there's a well-known jetstream effect. The prevailing winds blow in from center, hit the area behind home plate, then swirl back out through a gap in right field.

Then there's temperature. Parks that have significantly higher average temperatures (such as Arlington) are going to be more hitter-friendly as the ball carries more easily.

Then there's the less tangible effect that I believe is real when hitters say they simply feel more comfortable hitting in certain parks. Maybe a particular park has a more symmetrical outfield with an especially clear batter's eye.

Some places also play more night games than others when batters theoretically should have an easier time picking up the baseball.
All of this affects distance though. The very definition of a homeurn is hitting the ball a specified distance in the air.

And when you look at distances, it shows that the effects you mentioned are inconsistent. Houston is one of the warmest climates in baseball and there's supposedly a jetstream effect at Yankee Stadium.

Minute Maid Park and Yankee Stadium have the two lowest average homerun distances in the majors, so these effects exist in these stadiums, they must be on the DL.

Of course the Astros do suck which might skew that number.


Last edited by Machinehead: 12-27-2012 at 01:09 AM.
Machinehead is offline   Reply With Quote