Eric Lindros vs. Mark Messier - Who was more dominant in his prime?
View Single Post
12-27-2012, 09:27 AM
Join Date: Dec 2005
Originally Posted by
I'm looking more at the regular season when I look at these things and while plus/minus isn't the most telling stat the moose with plus/minus at minus 5 and compared to team mates really stands out and not in a good way either.
His minus 6 with the rangers in 93 is also surprising given his reputation and that he would have better years at an older age (perhaps talent support driven or simple variation or a bit of both).
He had a terrible year in 1993. The statistics actually favor him.
He was a turnover machine, which started with the 1992 PDF's against Pittsburgh.
View Public Profile
Steve Kournianos's albums
Find More Posts by Steve Kournianos