View Single Post
Old
12-27-2012, 10:25 PM
  #17
Metalcommand
Registered User
 
Metalcommand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country:
Posts: 778
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jedimyrmidon View Post
My argument was that a tournament with a bye takes into account teams that have demonstrated, over the course of the preliminary round, that they are probably better teams and so are deserving of a place in the semis (i.e. if something goes wrong, it's not in the QFs where you can't play for a medal if you lose).

whereas

a tournament without a bye means that the preliminary round doesn't actually mean much since you can be the best, but still not make it to the semis because of a bad QF game against a team that did much worse during the prelim round, which doesn't make sense; conversely, a team could be pretty horrible and lose most of its games, but still pull off a win when the result actually 'counts'. Doesn't mean that this team is more 'deserving'/better at all.

Hence, the winner of a tournament with a bye is more likely a team that 'should have' won if the point of the tournament is that the best team wins.
If you can't stand the heat and bring your A-game when the game actually has meaning you deserve to go out. If you are the best you win.

Perhaps Stanley Cup should also be awarded to President trophy winner? The idea is to find the best, they could have few bad games and lose a series dear god!

Metalcommand is offline   Reply With Quote