View Single Post
12-28-2012, 02:19 PM
I Am Score*
Join Date: Dec 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,536
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Major4Boarding View Post
Lawyer buddy I know says that the details of deal and that it addresses all apsects, including those already discussed during summer, is meant to kickstart negotiations but also can serve as an exhibit piece in court to show negotiation in good faith (and kill any chance on the PA's side to the contrary).

I would take this deal with a grain of salt at this point. If they are covering virtually every aspect it is either two things:

1. They are really trying to reach a deal before the season is cancelled

2. The sides are so far apart that neither believes a season will resume, so the NHL is planning for court battles

And whoever said the PA wouldn't take a 50-50 split is wrong, most players have stated that is what they indeed want and believe to be fair. Why they don't just make the max contract length 7 years and shorten the CBA term we might never know.

I Am Score* is offline   Reply With Quote