View Single Post
Old
12-28-2012, 09:21 PM
  #33
I Am Score*
---BradD---
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,666
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melrose Munch View Post
And yes we need 36. The NHL needs to be as visible as possible if it is to chase a TV contract.
Sorry dude but the less teams the better for the NHL. 30 is already too much in my opinion. More teams = less stacked teams = less excitement

When you build more teams you're going to start spreading these players and superstars out. If there were 36 teams, you wouldn't see the places like Washington have Backstrom and Ovechkin. You wouldn't see the places like Pittsburgh have Crosby, Malkin, and Neal.

If you did, it would turn NBA on you and the other teams would be decimated. There are already not enough talent to go around on these teams. Columbus has virtually no one.

I Am Score* is offline