View Single Post
12-29-2012, 09:53 AM
Melrose Munch
Registered User
Melrose Munch's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,103
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by KingsFan7824 View Post
The sad thing is the alignment they made in 98 was probably their best option if they had to realign. If the league could've put Vancouver in the Pacific, for example, they would have. They couldn't, so Dallas drew the very, very short straw.

I've always been a fan of the bigger groupings. I was a kid in the late 80's when I got into hockey, so I'm sure I'm a little biased, but those divisions had some character to them. To add teams to those core groups, I thought was great. Then they broke it all up, and just started hiding teams in the SE, and the Pacific was a similar experiment. I wouldn't say Washington and LA have been the most relevant NHL franchises in their histories. To break them away from other teams that the Caps and Kings had formed some sort of identity with, and then group them with so many recent expansion and relocated teams, it was just weird. There are now 5 Cup champs from those two divisions since 98 though.

As for the uneven divisions, to that I say just beat the teams that you're in a playoff race with, don't worry about other groups if you don't have to, and there's no crying in baseball anyway.
I agree. But of course wash was having problems. DC has more in Common with NY, Phi, Bos. Same with LA and the coast.

Originally Posted by Mayor Bee View Post
You're right about the bolded: only an idiot would say that.

The merger was originally met with a collective, "Wait, what?" in the business world. What AOL was doing at the time wasn't really relevant; it was universally recognized as an extremely bizarre and needless move. That's not with hindsight, that was at the time.
It was done to compete to create a juggernaut.

Melrose Munch is online now   Reply With Quote