Thread: Prospect Info: 2013 NHL Draft Thread
View Single Post
Old
12-29-2012, 11:33 AM
  #209
Sore Loser
HF Partner
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Spokane, WA.
Country: United States
Posts: 6,159
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by EspenK View Post
My guess is that it doesn't matter to the players. It may be a bone thrown to some owners to get them to support some other parts of the offer. Take a just missed playoff team that doesn't like some other things but sees this as a way to possibly improve a lot in a hurry. Not sure-just a guess.
I think this is exactly right. If I'm not mistaken, during the last lockout, some of the owners pushed for this clause to be implemented, but it wasn't. I believe that the league is offering this as part of bargaining to do just that, get everyone on the same page as far as stepping down on some of their hard-stance issues (such as contract term lengths, things like that). The league finally sees urgency to get this thing done, and is doing anything and everything they can to get all of the owners on board to do just that.

Sore Loser is offline