View Single Post
Old
12-29-2012, 07:57 PM
  #74
Bomber0104
Boom
 
Bomber0104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Iraq
Posts: 6,995
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodman19 View Post
For the sake of argument let's say we contract the top 4 earning teams causing the salary cap to plummet and let the remaining 26 teams to thrive. The rich teams are just as much of the problem as poor teams.

The fundamental issue is calibrating the cap to a level that let's owners make money while allowing the players to take the maximum they can get while allowing all teams to remain viable.
And that fundamental issue would require allowing free markets to overrule artificial anti-competitive activity.

Not every market is capable of bringing in the bacon.

But I disagree wholly with this idea that the rich markets are a problem. The only reason the NHL can fund their own investments in Sunbelt franchises are due to the proceeds from successful NHL teams.

Bomber0104 is offline   Reply With Quote