View Single Post
12-30-2012, 01:42 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 14,585
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Frankie View Post
why shouldn't he have been hired in the first place? you're judging him based on his time in toronto, which wasn't close to 10 years.

his title was gm, so we have to assume he had the same powers and authority as any other gm in the league. doesn't really matter much to your argument though. if someone else was pulling the strings, then that person should have gotten 10 years before being judged.

if you buy ken holland's idea, then you have to admit jfj was judged far too early into his tenure and should have been given 10 years.
Maybe he's judging based on his complete lack of any GM success or results anywhere prior to being handed the reins to one of the most storied franchises in the league?

eyeball11 is offline   Reply With Quote