View Single Post
Old
12-30-2012, 02:39 PM
  #70
eyeball11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 11,904
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bomber0104 View Post
That doesnt mean anything.

Its an irrelevant point.

Hasn't helped us in the standings, and evidently in the perception of our prospect pools in scouting panels.

No evidence these are good or bad moves.

Just moves.
So you guys want 1st rounders but don't want first rounders and you want them to provide immediate success whereas it normally takes teams many years to see benefits from draft picks. I really wish you guys would pick what you want. If you want young high picks than accept that it will take time to see success. If you want immediate success than accept that he'll need to go after a vet goalie (and possibly other vets at the expense of youth) and you'll then be sacrificing picks.

eyeball11 is offline   Reply With Quote