Thread: Proposal: Van-Ana then Van Chi
View Single Post
Old
12-31-2012, 11:11 AM
  #37
blankall
Registered User
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,194
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
For 2013-2014:

H. Sedin(6.1)-D. Sedin(6.1)-Burrows(4.5)
Booth(4.25)-Kesler(5.0)-Perry(6.0)
Higgins(1.9)-Bolland(3.375)-Hansen(1.35)
Lapierre(1.0)-Schroeder(1.0)-Jensen(.894)

Hamhuis(4.5)-Bieksa(4.6)
Edler(5.0)-Garrison(4.6)
Connauton(.9)-Tanev(.9)

Luongo(5.3)
Lack(.75)

Comes to 68 mil. What's the projected cap for 2013-2014? If it were 64 mil for 2012-2013, then 68 the following year should be doable, I think.

And sure I hate Bolland...But if he were on our team I think attitudes would change very quickly.
As other posters have said, cap will be 65 mil at the highest.

Perry is also likely to get 7+ mil.

Also, you have Higgins at 1.9, which is unlikely. He's going to want a raise.

You have no 7th d-man or 13th forward.

You're also relying on several players to make huge leaps forward in their careers. Cannauton, Schroeder, and Jensen are not locks to be NHL players at this point.

blankall is offline   Reply With Quote