Thread: NFL: Rookie of the Year
View Single Post
12-31-2012, 03:44 PM
Hot Carlson
Registered User
Hot Carlson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Country: United States
Posts: 1,882
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by No Fun Shogun View Post
Maybe, but the point still stands that the Skins almost assuredly would've ended up much higher in the standings than Colts in a universe where RGIII and Luck didn't exist. Not to mention that Luck effectively was playing for a team that got completely dismantled and rebooted.

The Colts leaned a lot more on Luck and asked him to do a lot more than RGIII and Wilson, who both had better teams around them in almost every single category.
That's a fair argument. It just depends on how you view the criteria for ROY.

I don't think it should be analogous with rookie MVP. I view it simply as the guy who was the most impressive. That's just my opinion, though. The body of work by Griffin and Wilson against decidedly tougher schedules than the Colts played makes them the front-runners IMO.

Hot Carlson is offline   Reply With Quote