View Single Post
Old
12-31-2012, 11:38 PM
  #61
MessierII
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,338
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiger_80 View Post
Buying out Horcoff only makes sense if there is an amnesty clause in the new CBA. If not, one has to take into considerations the costs. The old rules would keep Oilers on the hook for 2.666M in 2013/14; 3.666M in 2014/15, and 1.666M in each of the next 2 seasons).
Factoring in the cost of the replacement during the first 2 seasons (let's say a solid 3C would cost 2.5-3M per), they might be better off hanging on to Horcoff for at least 1 more year.
There is one in current offer that's the point of this thread. And yes it's Horcoff actually I don't even think there's a choice if your working with a 60 mil cap.

MessierII is offline   Reply With Quote