View Single Post
01-01-2013, 01:39 PM
Registered User
mschmidt64's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,050
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Bleed Ranger Blue View Post
So, you're just supportive of what would help the Rangers in any given moment?

What a noble stance.
Rangers have nothing to do with it. You can't make the argument that it's good for the sport to have teams having to trade away their best players merely to comply with a cap that they didn't anticipate.

Conversely, you can make the argument that a lot of the other owner proposals are good for the sport. Such as the ability to get out from bad contracts sooner, since bad contracts force teams to continue to employ bad players (or players who aren't earning their spots at least), and it waters down the product on the ice.

This proposal isn't good for the game.

mschmidt64 is offline