View Single Post
Old
01-03-2013, 03:22 AM
  #11
TheDevilMadeMe
Registered User
 
TheDevilMadeMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 45,407
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleBelfour View Post
We discuss about it before in the planning thread, just like my option, which was:

- After the swap of all picks prior to the draft, perhaps only accept 2-on-2 trades if any picks that change hands are in the Top-100, and then only accept 3-on-3 if any picks that change hands are in the Top-250/Top-300 etc ... My thought behind this is to easily be able to evaluate a trade with high picks involve (The consequences of a lopsided trade in the 500's isn't really important). I think most of the trades in the draft is for one team to get the player they are coveting, and this rule enable the teams to do so, while not giving a competitive advantage to another one.
VI presented the "no trade conference" idea a couple of years ago, but I don't see it in the planning thread.

I think your idea could be an option if "strict trading limits" wins, or do you think it should be its own option?

If there's more support for the "no trade conference" thing, I suppose we can add it as an option.


Last edited by TheDevilMadeMe: 01-03-2013 at 08:01 AM.
TheDevilMadeMe is offline