Quote:
Originally Posted by seventieslord
Yes, it would be. But let's face it, it would be a positive departure.
Right now it's a mish-mash of 32 teams being assassinated, with 32 guys trying to get reviews by doing reviews themselves. It doesn't lend itself well to actual comparison between teams, let alone what matters, teams in the same division.
|
We're lucky if half the teams assassinate anyone in the current format.
Quote:
|
What about awarding standings points for reviews done outside of one's division? There would have to be certain "word count" standards for them to count, and maybe something like just 0.5 points per review with a maximum of 6 bonus points to a guy who did 12 reviews, or something like that. Kind of like back in intramurals when there were bonus points for participation and sportsmanship.
|
I would like for there to be an incentive to assassinate teams, but I think adding points in the standings might be going too far.