Thread: Value of: David Desharnais
View Single Post
Old
01-04-2013, 09:28 AM
  #37
Frolov 6'3
Unregistered User
 
Frolov 6'3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 9,178
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drydenwasthebest View Post
No, a Kings fan is arrogant and being insulting when he claims that a 60 point center on a "below average team" would not be of interest to a playoff contending team. Especially when that fan provides no explanation for such an obviously...limited...point of view when considering the player he so blithely trashed would be the second highest point producing player on the Kings.

Maybe the next time you want to let people know a player is "just not so very so good" you might want to try and qualify that statement a little in order to prevent misunderstandings. Why is Desharnais "not so very so good"? Why would every team with serious playoff intentions be unwilling to have him on their teams? Try explaining such a...statement, it will be interesting to see...

By the way, I said "ignorant", not "arrogant".
Just because the Kings have sucked for decades doesnt mean I cant share my opinion. I've seen Derek Armstrong on the topline for years. Another heart & soul player and also a 60 point producer if he didnt get injured for 20-25 games every season. He played there because there was nobody else and something similar happened to Desharnais last year. There are more examples. Solid player, (below) average roster which results in a lot of icetime and no real goalscoring ability.

Stuff like "he would be the 2nd highest producer on the Kings last year" means nothing to me. I can only say, good to hear. I rather have Mike Richards or other 2nd line centers. I dont feel the need to explain that for obvious reasons.

Frolov 6'3 is offline   Reply With Quote