View Single Post
Old
01-04-2013, 03:40 PM
  #39
Jacob582
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,826
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duddy View Post
They're no assets, they're barely depth players in the NHL.

No team is picking either one up, because both are a waste of space on an NHL roster. Brennan is a one trick pony, on the same level as MAG and Weber is at best a #6 on any depth chart around the league.

Why would any team pick them up and gift them a spot on their roster?

Myers, Sekera, Ehrhoff, Sulzer, Regehr, Leopold, McNabb, Pardy, Scott etc..

And if worse comes to worse, you have guys like Crawford or Schiestel or Biega down in Rochester, but if you're that deep into injury trouble you're ****ed anyway.
I agree that Brennan is a one trick pony, and if he doesn't improve his D he won't have a good NHL career. But there is at least one team out there that needs his one trick this year and he would not clear waivers.

If Weber is at best 6th on somebody's depth chart then surely someone would claim him and have him on their roster in their top 7.

After 2006 playoffs and last year's injuries, Regier is obsessed with his depth of D. I don't think Weber is going anywhere.


Last edited by Jacob582: 01-04-2013 at 06:44 PM.
Jacob582 is offline   Reply With Quote