View Single Post
01-05-2013, 07:00 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 160
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Fourier View Post
Here is an example of what is wrong with the coverage of this whole debacle:

The difference between a $60M and $65M dollar cap does nothing to impact the total amount of money the players get. All it impacts is who gets what and where the players will be. Not that this is not significant, but now its is out there that it amounts to a $1.5B take-back by the owners. This is Ovechkin Math at its finest. The sad part is that a lot of people will read it, including many players, and take it as the turth.

Not only that but they are only talking about the cap for next year, not 10 yrs.

j44thor is offline