Are the big market teams the losers here?
View Single Post
01-05-2013, 02:05 PM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Originally Posted by
And there in lays the rub. The real issue that the "anti-parity" posters have (even if they don't realize it) is with free-agency not the cap. The problem is free-agency isn't going anywhere: The courts have made THAT clear.
Free-agency + no salary cap + the need for big markets to field championship teams = player salaries that do not make sense for the league as a whole.
I guess what frustrates me is people look back on the uncapped era’s in pro sports with blissful ignorance completely ignoring all of the issues (court cases, lockouts, player strikes) that have lead professional sports to an era of free agency and salary caps.
Last edited by du5566*: 01-05-2013 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by du5566*