Quote:
Originally Posted by haseoke39
Are you kidding? The facts in Lumber & Sawmill are nothing like this. In that case, a CBA between the parties existed at the time, no negotiations were going on, and the company locked out its workers because of a safety concern without following any of the CBA-agreed upon procedure for managing a safety issue. That would be good precedent if it was 2010 and the owners locked out the players because they didn't like their ties.
|
With all due respect, the question of law is the same...
1-"a CBA between the parties existed at the time, no negotiations were going on, and the company locked out its workers because of a safety concern without following any of the CBA-agreed upon procedure for managing a safety issue"
= Case involving or growing out of a Labor Dispute -- Check
2-NHL Lockout 2012-13
= Case involving or growing out of a Labor Dispute -- Check.
Ratio: Anti-injunction provisions of section 4(a) of the Norris Laguardia Act don't apply to protect employers.