View Single Post
Old
01-05-2013, 01:05 PM
  #263
Erik Estrada
Registered User
 
Erik Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,861
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by haseoke39 View Post
Are you kidding? The facts in Lumber & Sawmill are nothing like this. In that case, a CBA between the parties existed at the time, no negotiations were going on, and the company locked out its workers because of a safety concern without following any of the CBA-agreed upon procedure for managing a safety issue. That would be good precedent if it was 2010 and the owners locked out the players because they didn't like their ties.
With all due respect, the question of law is the same...

1-"a CBA between the parties existed at the time, no negotiations were going on, and the company locked out its workers because of a safety concern without following any of the CBA-agreed upon procedure for managing a safety issue" = Case involving or growing out of a Labor Dispute -- Check

2-NHL Lockout 2012-13 = Case involving or growing out of a Labor Dispute -- Check.

Ratio: Anti-injunction provisions of section 4(a) of the Norris Laguardia Act don't apply to protect employers.

Erik Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote