NHLPA starts another 'disclaimer' vote
View Single Post
01-05-2013, 02:26 PM
**** Cycle 4 Eichel
Join Date: Mar 2011
Originally Posted by
With all due respect, the question of law is the same...
1-"a CBA between the parties existed at the time, no negotiations were going on, and the company locked out its workers because of a safety concern without following any of the CBA-agreed upon procedure for managing a safety issue"
= Case involving or growing out of a Labor Dispute -- Check
2-NHL Lockout 2012-13
= Case involving or growing out of a Labor Dispute -- Check.
Anti-injunction provisions of section 4(a) of the Norris Laguardia Act don't apply to protect employers.
So what you're saying is that lockouts are always illegal in anything that could be characterized as a "labor dispute," and that "labor dispute" means anything ranging from negotiations with a union to just plain breaking your existing agreement with your people.
When, pray tell, is a lockout legal, then?
Last edited by haseoke39: 01-05-2013 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by haseoke39