View Single Post
01-05-2013, 08:26 PM
The Legend
Stamkos in 2016
The Legend's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,822
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by DuklaNation View Post
Under an audit, the related party transactions would be duly noted. Therefore, hardly 'fantasy'.
Only if you're using US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (aka what they'd be using if the hawks were a publicly listed entity). Since they're not, they could be using any criteria for their accounting.

I suspect - and this is just a guess - that they are using the definition of hockey related revenue as noted in the CBA (for revenue). For costs - they can come up with whatever definition they want for their auditors to use (since its not in the CBA). Debt service costs (regardless of related party) would probably fall under that...

The Legend is offline