View Single Post
Old
01-06-2013, 10:24 PM
  #42
Pseudonymous
Registered User
 
Pseudonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,498
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleach Clean View Post
I agree. I liked Samuelsson, he's a versatile player. I still make that trade though, hands down. This top6 forward is going to be around a lot longer than Samuelsson, and he plays a style this team is trying to adopt. Those are the main reasons he was picked up IMO.


But again, it's up to you if you are willing to acknowledge that fact.
The people that mention he'll be around longer. Well think about this.

Do you take the 80 percent or the 90 percent, the 80 percent lasts longer but why can't you replace the 90 percent with another 80 or 90 when the time comes? dont you come out on top? his salary and no demand for long contracts made that possible

Guys act as if we couldn't find another player when samuelsson faded out. With 4.5 million, i think its possible

Since when do you trade a player for a player thats worse because he'll play for longer *shrug*

Pseudonymous is offline