View Single Post
Old
01-07-2013, 12:23 PM
  #190
Ronning On Empty
Moderator
Formerly BleachClean
 
Ronning On Empty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 19,751
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by trbr86 View Post
Yeah, that's where I imagine things could get really tricky. The Canucks could argue that they shouldn't be liable for his cap hit because (theoretically) he retired because of injury. It sounds like it could become some sort of legal challenge.


Yeah, very tricky indeed. How it is argued can affect it's interpretation. He can be bought out and LTIR'd if the Canucks "own" the deal. Which they would. As long as that's the case, I think we're good.

Ronning On Empty is offline