View Single Post
Old
01-07-2013, 11:23 AM
  #191
arsmaster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 16,792
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by trbr86 View Post
Yeah, that's where I imagine things could get really tricky. The Canucks could argue that they shouldn't be liable for his cap hit because (theoretically) he retired because of injury. It sounds like it could become some sort of legal challenge.
Yeah, and what happens if the acquiring team no longer wants him and sends him to the minors or benches him forcing him to retire?

Doesn't seem fair that the Canucks would have to "pay" for another teams poor handling of an asset.

arsmaster is offline