View Single Post
01-07-2013, 08:42 PM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Originally Posted by
This post is laughable. Are you seriously comparing the Hossa situation to Crosby?
One is the best player in the NHL signed through age 37.
The other is maybe one of the top-20 forwards in the league, already 34, signed through age 42.
People who think it is ridiculous to buy-out Hossa are being extremely short-sighted. Yeah he might be decent for the next four seasons. But do you really think he is going to play out the last 4-5 years of that contract in his last-30's early 40's when making $1m a year?
At that point we'll be allocating a $5+ million chunk of our cap to a guy not on the team. For 4-5 seasons.
You make no point but making an great argument why you don't buy him out. All he needs to be is good for 4 more years just like you said. Once he is at 1 mil a year he is gone unless he is still playing at a 5 mil a year type player. If not he would be so easy to trade to a team that does not like to spend a lot of money. Say even if Hossa at that time is a 30-40 point player and plays solid D, you can't sign a guy like that for a mil a year, which is all that matters to a owner that won't spend money anyway cause cap space is not relevant at that point just pure money. He would still be a big time bargain to a team that has an internal budget. How can some people just not grasp how this long term front-loaded contracts will play out.
As for the last part how would Hossa cost us 5 mil of cap space if he is not on the Hawks? If we trade him, he costs us nothing or he retires (which could be highly likely instead of taking the NHL abuse for a mil a year) and his cap hit is still gone.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Happyhary9