View Single Post
Old
01-07-2013, 10:39 PM
  #89
Orr123
Registered User
 
Orr123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,664
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wood View Post
Couldn't agree more. I've seen far too many highly skilled Sens teams fail in the playoffs because they were so soft. I can't believe how many people seem to have forgotten that. Does anyone really believe that last years team could have taken the Rangers to seven games if Carkner didn't do what he did in game two?
But you don't need an entire team of "tough" guys either.

I feel like people think the loss of Carkner and Foligno are going to make the Sens super soft.

But really, we still have Smith, Neil, Greening... can I hope that Methot is a bit tough?? (I don't know enough about him, really). But honestly, we have 3-4 tough guys, I think that is probably enough. And I feel like we have more "tough" guys, as in big, heavy presence, not necessarily fighters in our prospect ring a bit as well.

Orr123 is online now   Reply With Quote