View Single Post
01-08-2013, 10:41 AM
Rubber Biscuit
Registered User
Rubber Biscuit's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 7,702
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by cneely View Post
I disagree. I think the complaints should be directed at the guy who decided not to honor his deal, and made the cap hit unmoveable.
I think you're a little off in suggesting that Chia didn't understand the implications of the deal he signed. He simply didn't foresee Thomas' decision not to play.
I believe it's been reported that PC actually admitted to misinterpreting/misunderstanding the 35+ rule. And if he didn't anticipate there being a chance TT could retire at 39 years old, well than that's his fault.

If TT retired, his contract would be literally untradeable and the Bruins would be stuck with the cap hit.

I'll look for a source to back up my first statement.

Rubber Biscuit is offline   Reply With Quote