View Single Post
01-08-2013, 02:59 PM
Registered User
frag2's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,879
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Bleach Clean View Post
What was your assessment poor/fair/good, prior to the recapture formula?

I look at it like this: His contract was illegally great prior to the new CBA. Now, it's still good, but only if you have a shrewd GM. It's dropped in value slightly because their is the re-capture formula in play. However, it's so pathetic or miniscule that it only slightly affects how you see the deal.

What var is saying is that it was a discount before. This cannot be denied. Now, they "punish" the tail end of the deal. Again, slightly. So do the teams still get the _cap_ discount for another 6 years? Yup. Does the ding at the final 3 years overrule or outweigh the discount received for twice as long a term before hand? No. So overall it just balances (and I'm being kind, it's really just a slap on the wrist) the deal.
You do know that if Luongo gets traded this year, retires with 1 year remaining, the penalty for that 1 year is ~6M right? For the Nucks sake, once traded, they hope he retires early as the 6M gets spread over X years remaining.

The longer they hold onto Luongo, they're better off cap wise [and barring his performance declining drastically] to just hang onto him till he retires.

Mike Gillis put himself in a tough position now with the new CBA rules and uncertainty of cap direction in 2 years.

frag2 is offline