View Single Post
Old
01-08-2013, 10:17 PM
  #14
Tender Rip
Learning from Scuds?
 
Tender Rip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 12,804
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentM View Post
Oh wow, I hadn't heard about this at all! This opens so many new possibilities for trades. I can't imagine how much more whacked out the offers on the Trade Forum page will be now
Yeah, that's going to be insane .

Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentM View Post
But on the negative side it also gives an advantage to big market teams correct the mistakes they make in Free Agency. Teams like the Rangers or Toronto would be much more likely to pay part of a players salary to improve their return or to simply get rid of them than Nashville or Columbus or even us.
One little wrinkle here, but as I read the rules, it could also some times play in the opposite direction.
Take Redden as an example. Rangers just sent him down and kept that mistake off the NHL roster, thus suffering no cap consequences.
With this rule, say they had found someone to take him while paying some of the salary. That cap-hit they would have to take and the impact would be like buying him out, just cheaper. As the economic benefit of trading the player is so significant compared to retaining all the costs, even the most deep pocketed teams will likely do this.

Also, if Vancouver wants to get out from under Luongo for instance, and take on some salary/caphit, that will improve the return they get on Luongo, but it also takes away some of their cap-room.
In KIRK's Calgary example, that's not an issue for Calgary as they would be going nowhere in the short term anyway, but for Vancouver having (say) two million less in cap-space next season (and a long time into the future), that would be an issue for a contender.

But it surely will open some very interesting scenarios.

Tender Rip is offline   Reply With Quote