Around Hockey X (All Non-Jackets Hockey talk in here)
View Single Post
01-09-2013, 01:06 PM
Join Date: Dec 2008
Originally Posted by
Based on last year's payroll, you really going to argue that Howson hasn't been given essentially limitless resources within the bounds of the CBA. At this point Howson almost has as many guys helping him do his job as Burke did his.
As for the argument of "closer to family," the NHL talent pool is more spread out than it was in 1960. You think Russian players, kids from Saskatoon or kids from the US give two hoots about Toronto?
I think the Leafs brand is more tarnished than people lead on. Kids who grew up in the late 80's and 90's aren't lining up because of some great memories of the Leafs. These aren't kids raised in the '60's when the Leafs were one of the top teams in the league.
Also, I think the Leafs actually have a huge built-in disadvantage. The city is so hungry for a winner that a guy like Kessel who puts up 82 points is still hated by the fans. That atmosphere is something a lot of guys don't want. Yes, if the team were ever competently run being a part of a winner would yield huge rewards. But as long as the team is mediocre or worse, don't expect free meals or a beer.
So, let's not pretend that Brian Burke's job was any more easy than Howson's.
Should we compare who came into their job with more actual NHL talent on the roster? How about the farm system? How about drafting since they took over?
The answers, of course, are Burke, Burke, and a decided advantage to Howson. Even if we pare the drafting down to just 2009-present for the sake of equalizing, Howson still easily trumps Burke.
As for the rest of your post, I still think that there's a greater draw to the Leafs than you're giving credit for. Kids who grew up in Sweden still grew up with the legends of Borje Salming and then Mats Sundin, and they've certainly had respectable other European players as well.
View Public Profile
Mayor Bee's albums
Find More Posts by Mayor Bee