View Single Post
01-10-2013, 08:54 AM
Kane One
Registered User
Kane One's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, New NY
Country: United States
Posts: 34,680
vCash: 1425
Originally Posted by pld459666 View Post
Regarding Redden, since this not the kind of back diving deal that the NHL is looking to punish, anyone think that Redden retire and take a coaching position with the team. An Assistant Coach for Ken Gernander to work with the defenceman?

the variable between his actual salary and what his cap hit is just about 23%, far less than the currently allowed 35%. It is also ALOT higher than the 50% difference between his current salary and the highest salary during the term of his contract.

In the last 4 years, he's made 29 of his 39 million he signed for, retiring and taking a front office position now will allow him to by pass the atrophy that will set in on his already deteriorating skills as he sits in the press box for a full year.

I know that there were three options listed, but I believe walking away from the contract is an option that would not have a negative impact on the team.

Again, this contract is not what the NHL is looking to punish or eliminate.
I don't think there's a chance that happens. Would you want to pass up the money AND end your career like that? If I were him, I'd take the money and see if my career is really over. He should try to make the NHL again.

Glass from Girardi is practically a mathematical impossibility. I'm glad to have witnessed this great Rangers moment. -Bob Richards
I'd hate to know what the toilet facilities look like after a game with the way this team aims... -Megustaelhockey
Kane One is offline   Reply With Quote