View Single Post
01-11-2013, 08:35 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,669
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Whitesnake View Post
What kind of explanation is this? We, not me I know, but as part as the Habs nation...., gave him a 4-year contract. Did anybody expected him to retire at year 2? And when we did, is he part of the plan? Did we have to think about getting a player to replace him in year 3 or were we concentrating in improving somewhere else since we had him at that position? Are we fine to see Kovalchuck staying in Russia 'cause he doesn't owe anybody anything?
You gave him a 4 year contract with a clause that said he can retire whenever he wants for whatever reason he wants.

Ilya would be operating against a transfer agreement between NHL and KHL.

Pretty big difference there.

NotProkofievian is online now   Reply With Quote