View Single Post
01-13-2013, 02:00 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 48,800
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Ogrezilla View Post
who is suggesting we do that? You tend to be overly dramatic when someone disagrees with you. And I don't even really disagree with you. I am for Shero taking a risk if that's all that is available.
Well, Rowdy did suggest that anyone like me who would like to see a GM take ONE risk really wants the GM to take risks all the time.

As for you, it sounds then like we're really arguing over whether the Gogo deal was a risk. I'll put it this way: If it was, then it was as risk free an impact move that a GM can make, far less risky than the Hossa deal and less risky than the Whitney deal in that we were hoping to replace a 2/3 defenseman, not a guy who was fifth on the depth chart on a fully healthy defensive roster. Better?

KIRK is offline