View Single Post
01-15-2013, 07:04 PM
Registered User
MXD's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 22,719
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Hawkey Town 18 View Post
I would be interested in hearing some last minute thoughts on Rollins vs. Connell vs. Kiprusoff
Connell looks pretty good by the vs. backup metric (and the vs. replacement metric). Like, better than Roy Worters. Most consistent performer amongst those three players, with only one year appearing to be below-average. And even then, considering how much he totally destroyed his backup, pretty unlikely that he was actually below-average... I guess his main flaw was the lack of voting support -- but then again, some votes might be wrong (see, for starters, Al Rollins...)

Rollins? Short career that MIGHT be magnified by playing (mostly) for a bad team. I think he needs to go below Kerr and Thomas.

Kipper? Workhorse. I'm a bit concerned that his skills already started to dwindle away, which would mean that he had a pretty short career.

MXD is offline   Reply With Quote