View Single Post
Old
01-15-2013, 10:55 PM
  #3
Strafer
Registered User
 
Strafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: da Hub
Country: United States
Posts: 6,705
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSeguinEra2010 View Post
I think if he is going to be part the next great defenseman in Bruins lore I think he should pick a new number and ditch #53. I know he wore #27 in juniors and think that because no Bruin currently wears it he could get it pretty easily.
Twenty seven would be a heck of alot better than BLAH 53. Actually, a double number would be best IMHO maybe 66? Not
quite sure if anyone else in the league is using it yet and I don't think that it should be given the same reverence as 99.
Six would be good too but it seems to be considered little jinxed.

Strafer is offline   Reply With Quote