View Single Post
Old
01-17-2013, 02:02 PM
  #64
Djp
Registered User
 
Djp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle,WA
Posts: 6,361
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jame View Post
that makes close to no sense.

Buffalo had no need for Pardy, he was clearly part of the trade in a negative value way. We took the contract off Dallas hands. Why would they take it back now?
Not necessarily...it could be partly to balance out the salaries of the players.

Without traing camp and scrimmages it made it harder to evaluste the talent they had. They stick with familiarity.

Was he part of it to balance out salary or did they look at him as more of a 4th line enforcement player rather than a D-man ??? I dont know what the GMs talked about.

Djp is offline   Reply With Quote