*ALL* Luongo Talk (News/Speculation/Rumors/Proposals)
View Single Post
01-18-2013, 04:17 PM
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by
I'm actually totally fine with it. Sends a message that simply because we have too many good assets - we are not going to be give garbage teams our redundant yet valuable players. If they don't like it, they can beat it.
They can rot in the bottom of the standings, while Vancouver continues its tradition of excellence and league dominance.
Two outstanding goaltenders will be crucial with our shortened season, as is having a lot of depth defencemen.
I'm totally fine with it too. Unless a deal improves us to a greater extent than the loss of Luongo then we should stick with both goalies even in the worst case scenario if we do need to trade Luongo for peanuts next summer. Does adding Bozak make up for the loss of Luongo? Not even close.
Last edited by vanwest: 01-18-2013 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by vanwest